From: Randolph Wang <rywang@CS.Princeton.EDU>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:15:31 -0500 (EST)
To: livstone@princeton.edu, dtrueman@princeton.edu, pdds@math.princeton.edu, crogers@tufts.edu, csfac@CS.Princeton.EDU
Cc: randy_class2@CS.Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: undergraudate independent work checkpoints


Dear advisors, thanks to those of you who have emailed me already.  If
you haven't, please send me your feedback as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Randy



>  Date: 24 Mar 2004 10:33:43 -0500 
>  From: Randolph Wang <rywang@CS.Princeton.EDU> 
>  To: livstone@princeton.edu, alaink@princeton.edu, 
>     dtrueman@princeton.edu, dpd@cs, pdds@math.princeton.edu, 
>        crogers@tufts.edu, csfac 
>  CC: randy_class2@cs 
>  Subject: undergraudate independent work checkpoints 
>  Reply-to: rywang@cs.princeton.edu 
>   
>   
>  Dear CS independent work advisors, 
>   
>  (Please ignore if you're not supervising undergrad students.) 
>   
>  The IW students were required to submit a "checkpoint" the past 
>  Monday.  (The thesis students had an extra week.)  Please take a look 
>  at their submissions online. 
>   
>  http://dsh.cs.washington.edu:8000/Projects/04sIND/upload/ 
>   
>  I will collect input from you some time next week.  The inputs are: 
>  (a) a score between 0-10 (inclusive, 10 being the best), and (b) any 
>  (optional) feedback you might have for the students. 
>   
>  (I might adjust your scores a little to make things more equal across 
>  the board.) 
>   
>  In their proposal slides from the beginning of the semester, they 
>  should have said what they plan to have done by this checkpoint. 
>  While the plan is certainly not meant to be cast in stone and you 
>  don't have to look over them, you may decide to base part of your 
>  scores on how close they are to what they promised.  In addition to 
>  the proposal slides, you can also find online their presentations 
>  captured in .avi movie formats. 
>   
>   
>  Thanks, 
>  Randy 
>   
>   
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>   
>  P.S., 
>   
>  The following is what they were told to submit for the checkpoint. 
>   
>  Submit 4-5 powerpoint slides summarizing your progress. You slides 
>  should address the following: 
>   
>       Remind me what you have proposed to have done by the checkpoint.  
>   
>       Report what you have actually accomplished by the checkpoint in 
>       terms of steps/deliverables.  
>   
>       Give preliminary results.  
>   
>       Report difficulties, surprises, and/or deviations from the 
>       proposal.  
>   
>       Describe what more you plan to accomplish by the end of the 
>       semester in terms of steps/deliverables. 
>   
>   


Re: undergraudate independent work checkpoints / Randolph Wang